Archive for the ‘Suicide bombers and the threat to executives’ Category

Cross Dressing Suicide Bomber No Laughing Matter

October 2, 2007

Yesterday a male suicide bomber wearing a burqa (the long black garb typically worn by women in the Middle East;known by various names depending on the country) killed 16 people and wounded 29 after he detonated his device at a Police checkpoint in Pakistan.

This incident again portrays the lethality of the suicide bomber as the ultimate smart weapon but equally how exploiting the male tendency to dismiss women as a potential threat can be a deadly mistake.

In the case of the male suicide bomber disguised as a female, the ability to get close to the target, seems to have been enhanced by his disguise. The bomber correctly guessed that his appearance as a female would not subject him to the close scrutiny a man might have received under similar conditions. Wearing the female  disguise also increased his ability to carry a larger explosive device/suicide belt than he would have been able to if he was wearing male garb, even traditional Pakistan male garb consisting of the knee length shirt (“qmis”) with traditional trousers (“shalwar”).  The explosives did not need to be concealed under his outer clothing since the burqa served that purpose.

Fortunately in western countries, this exact type of disguise has a limited effectiveness since burqas aren’t common however the threat is just as real. Using females as suicide bombers is a very effective terrorist tactic to circumvent security posts that are staffed by men. The male mindset still does not view women with the same degree of suspicion as another male. It’s a cultural and sociological characteristic that has its roots in the development of humans. Historically and traditionally, men fight men and we have become accustomed to regarding other men as a greater threat than we do women.

In the Executive Protection world, we should not need any reminder of how effective women have been at targeting executives. Women terrorists have been active members of many terrorist and criminal organizations that have successfully targeted executives and other key persons. From the female suicide bombers of the Tamil Tigers to the female terrorists of European terrorist groups, women have earned their title of the “deadlier species” particularly when it comes to assassinating executives.

The single greatest characteristic of why women make effective terrorists is the fact that a woman will kill a man without hesitation whereas a man will not instinctively kill a woman. A woman’s ability to lower a man’s natural defensive mechanisms merely by her presence, gives the female terrorist the added advantage of the initiative in any attack. As the memo (click on the link below) from the Federal Air Marshal Service states, “females have the element of surprise.” A split second element of surprise changes the dynamics of the encounter for any male encountering a female terrorist into one of reaction which will always be slower than action.

Our reaction to women is a matter of conditioning. However, whenever conditioning impedes
good security, then it’s time to change. A warning to male readers: dismiss females as potential sources of threats at your own peril.

Dressed to Kill: Why Air Marshals Are Concerned » The Aviation Nation

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

MIT Student With Fake Bomb Highlights Need For Comprehensive Suicide Bomber Response

September 25, 2007

I’m a bit late getting to this story but it’s important enough not to let it go. By now most of you have read about the MIT student who walked into Boston’s Logan Airport with some sort of clay mock up resembling a bomb, strapped to her chest. I must express nothing but complete admiration for the Massachusetts
State Trooper who handled this situation in such a manner that I’m not
sure I could have. The general consensus is that she’s lucky to be alive to explain what she had strapped to her chest. Yet, I can’t help wonder if part of the reason why she’s alive today is because we’re not quite sure what to do in these circumstances.

Suicide bombers are a real concern for me, not just from the perspective of Executive Protection either. From the Executive Protection point of view, suicide bombers are a serious threat. Suicide bombers have been used successfully to assassinate key leaders and their success likely means suicide bombers will be used again to assassinate protected persons. The Executive Protection community needs to be prepared to respond to that eventuality but I’m also concerned from a larger American perspective. Suicide bombers will eventually hit the U.S. This isn’t any great pronouncement. It’s been said by many others who have far greater insight on these things than I do. My concern stems from what I believe is a lack of a coherent U.S. strategy to respond with this threat and the longer we wait, the greater our exposure.

Right now it seems that there are two prevailing views on how to respond to suicide bombers in the U.S. To the best of my knowledge, the only two organizations in the U.S. that have publicly taken a stand on suicide bombers are the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) and the Police Executive Research Forum (PERF).
PERF advocates deadly force as a last option in response to the “inevitable” whereas the IACP advocates deadly force when the threat is “significant.” Regardless of what approach you subscribe to, this is about as close as it gets to publicly available guidelines for responding to suicide bombers. Several colleagues in various U.S. federal law enforcement agencies have told me, confidentially, that their agency doesn’t have any policy, written or otherwise.

In the Executive Protection community, the response to a suicide bomber seems to be better defined because the threat presented by a suicide bomber seems to be somewhat clearer. However I can also see where in other instances where the response to a suicide bomber might be much murkier. For example, if a suicide bomber is interdicted outside a courthouse before the bomber has a change to detonate his or her device and the public is kept safely away, would deadly force be appropriate? What about if this situation took place in a mall or on a bus or subway? I must admit that I go back and forth on how to respond in such circumstances.

Anyway, this is an issue that I will continue to follow and share whatever information comes available.

Woman Walks Through Logan Airport with Mock Bomb » The Aviation Nation

Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.

On the Cusp: The Next Wave of Female Suicide Bombers?

September 21, 2007

On the Cusp: The Next Wave of Female Suicide Bombers?
By Fred Burton and Scott Stewart

Two recent incidents have called attention to one of the possible repercussions of military operations waged against large groups of Islamist militants.

The first incident occurred Sept. 2, when the Lebanese army took complete control of the Nahr el-Bared refugee camp in Tripoli, overrunning the last remaining Fatah al-Islam militants who had been holed up in the camp since May. Shortly before this final offensive was launched, the Lebanese army allowed the last of the militants’ wives and children to evacuate the camp. The women allegedly were subjected to “gruesome” interrogations by Lebanese intelligence officers who were attempting to gather crucial information on the remaining militants in the camp prior to their assault. The women also were reportedly subjected to invasive searches by female military personnel. Most of the haggard-looking women who left the Nahr el-Bared camp are in their early 20s.

In the second incident, which occurred Sept. 13, a suicide bomber detonated in the mess hall of a military facility belonging to the Pakistani army’s elite Special Services Group in the town of Tarbela Ghazi, Pakistan, killing 20 people and injuring 42. The attack was the latest in a wave of suicide bombings that have wracked Pakistan since the Pakistani army’s assault in July 2006 against militants barricaded inside the Red Mosque — an assault led by commandos of the Special Services Group. A report in the Indian media suggests the suicide bomber was a Pakistani military officer who had lost his younger sister in the Red Mosque operation. This report likely is not true, but nevertheless it raises the issue of the hundreds of women who were involved with the militants in the Red Mosque, many of whom were young students at Jamia Hafsa, the female madrassah affiliated with the Red Mosque.

These two operations were led by national armies in two totally different regions of the world, but their respective targets, concentration of militant Islamists and bloody and violent outcomes — which, in both cases, were provoked and precipitated by the militants — were very similar. The operations also were analogous in that they directly affected hundreds of radicalized young women who survived the operations. The factors raise the possibility that at least some of these women could go on to form the next wave of female suicide bombers.

History

Female suicide bombers are not a new phenomenon. They have been around for more than 20 years and have arrived in several waves. The first wave occurred in Lebanon in the mid-1980s. Though Lebanon is where Hezbollah pioneered modern militant suicide bombers, the women in the first wave were not fundamentalist Muslims; they were secular members of the communist Syrian Socialist Nationalist Party who conducted suicide car bomb attacks against the Israeli military and the Israeli-supported South Lebanon Army from 1985 to 1987.

The second wave of female suicide operatives began on May 21, 1991, when a female member of the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam assassinated former Indian Prime Minister Rajiv Gandhi after placing a garland around his neck at a political rally. Since the Gandhi assassination, the Tigers have used more female suicide bombers than any other militant group, reportedly deploying at least 46 women on suicide missions since 1991.

From 1996 to 1999, the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) carried out a series of attacks against Turkish military and police targets using female suicide bombers. Several of the PKK operatives strapped their explosive devices to their stomachs to give the appearance that they were pregnant.

From 2000 to 2004, female Chechen militants, often referred to as “Black Widows,” were involved in several suicide attacks against Russian military targets in Chechnya, civilian targets in Russia — such as subways, rock concerts and airliners — and an assassination attempt against the Chechen president. The bulk of the attacks in this wave occurred in 2003 and 2004. Female militants also played visible roles in the dramatic Chechen hostage operations, such as the October 2002 seizure of a Moscow theater and the September 2004 seizure of a school in Beslan.

The Chechen group was the first radical Islamist or jihadist organization to employ women as suicide bombers. Though the jihadist theology is very chauvinistic and the concept of martyrdom it dwells upon is largely focused on men, the concept of women martyrs is supported in the Koran. Indeed, Islam’s first martyr was a woman named Somaiya. Therefore, it is not surprising to see such groups apply the arguments they use to justify men’s martyrdom via suicide bombing to women as well. In addition to the anger and revenge motives frequently seen in other female suicide bombers, the Muslim concept of martyrdom involves the forgiveness of all sins and immediate entrance into paradise, so suicide bombing often is seen as an avenue to atone for the shame and sins of an extramarital affair or out-of-wedlock pregnancy.

With the beginning of the second or “al-Aqsa” Intifada in September 2000, suicide bombers became a commonly used weapon for Palestinian militant groups. However, when Israeli security responded to the rash of suicide bombings by instituting security measures that prevented most of the male suicide bombers from reaching their targets, the Palestinians countered those measures by employing female bombers. The Palestinian militant groups began using female suicide bombers in 2002, when a 28-year-old woman affiliated with the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade detonated in Jerusalem, killing one other person and wounding 100. Following the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade’s lead, Palestinian Islamic Jihad and Hamas also have deployed female suicide bombers in attacks against Israel. The wave of Palestinian suicide bombers — and particularly female Palestinian suicide bombers — has waned dramatically since its peak in 2002-2003; there have been no reports of female Palestinian suicide bombers in Israel since 2005 (though there were two female suicide bomb attacks against Israeli forces in Gaza in November 2006).

Abu Musab al-Zarqawi’s al Qaeda in Iraq got into the female suicide bomber business in late 2005, and Iraq is currently where female suicide operatives are used most frequently. Perhaps al Qaeda in Iraq’s most highly publicized use of such an operative was in the Nov. 9, 2005, bombing attack against three Western hotels in Amman, Jordan. The female operative involved in the attack against a wedding reception in the Radisson SAS hotel attempted to detonate her suicide belt at the same time as her husband, but her device failed and her videotaped confession was widely covered by the world media. The publicity surrounding the Amman bombings eclipsed another interesting case that happened that same day in Baghdad, when a Belgian-born convert to Islam attacked a U.S. motorcade and became the first European female suicide bomber.

Some recent Internet reports suggest that the Islamic State of Iraq — the al Qaeda-led jihadist group alliance — has announced that it has formed a special all-female suicide bomber brigade and made an appeal for women to join it. However, the jihadists have sporadically employed female suicide bombers in Iraq since 2005 — some were used as recently as this summer — so even if this report is true, the formation of such a brigade likely will not make much difference tactically, as the use of female suicide bombers in Iraq is expected to continue. However, the creation of such a unit within the Islamic State of Iraq would seem to be ideologically important, signifying that the concept of female suicide bombers is gaining more widespread acceptance in the jihadist community.

Advantages

The advantages to using suicide bombers are obvious. They allow militant organizations to use “human smart bombs” who can guide ordnance around security measures and place a device in close proximity to a target — such as a heavily packed crowd in a wedding reception, subway car or hotel lobby. Because of this, militant operational planners can use suicide bombers to cause more damage than would be inflicted by a larger device that detonates farther from its intended target.

Smaller explosive devices also are more economical to make. A large truck bomb might contain several hundred pounds of explosives and can only be used in a single location. With the same quantity of explosives required for one truck bomb, dozens of 10- to 20-pound suicide devices can be made. This allows for multiple simultaneous attacks, such as those witnessed in Amman, or the July 2005 London attacks or October 2005 Bali suicide attacks — though it also can allow for a prolonged series of attacks.

Women provide a tactical advantage in that they do not fit many law enforcement and security professionals’ preconceived profile of a terrorist. Mohammed Atta now personifies that profile, but a slightly built 20-year-old woman does not and will not receive the same scrutiny.

There also are cultural issues associated with searching women — or even looking at them for that matter. This is especially true of Muslim women and of women in general in many Islamic countries. This means that female operatives are given a free pass at many security checkpoints. These cultural and attitudinal issues are expanded when combined with physical issues such as the burqa and the niqab (face covering) that obscures a woman’s face. Such clothing not only makes it very easy to conceal an explosive device or other weapon but also hides many of the nonverbal cues that security forces are taught to look for when identifying possible suicide bombers. These factors sometimes lead male militants in Muslim countries to dress as women to attempt to gain an operational advantage.

Suicide bombers targeting VIPs pose unique challenges to protective details due to the close proximity of unscreened people at public events and the VIPs’ desire to shake hands and mingle. The use of female suicide bombers in such a situation can be even more effective, as executive protection personnel are less likely to view them as a threat. This tactic was used not only in the Gandhi assassination but also in the May 2003 attempt on then-Chechen President Akhmed Kadyrov.

Using women as suicide bombers also provides militant organizations with a larger pool of operatives and allows a militant organization to deploy its male operatives for other types of missions. The psychological impact that comes with using female suicide bombers also is dramatic.

A Grim Forecast

In addition to the continuation of the current wave of female suicide bombers in Iraq, there soon could be new waves of female suicide bombers spawned by the recent events in Nahr el-Bared and the Red Mosque.

Before the storming of the Red Mosque, the students at the madrassahs associated with it were involved in a number of high-profile incidents. Following the July 2005 London bombings, Pakistani authorities attempted to raid the mosque to look for evidence tying the institution to the bombings; they were met by baton-wielding women who denied them entry to the facility. Earlier this year, authorities in Islamabad began to demolish part of the mosque that they said infringed on public land. This resulted in a group of female students (some toting Kalashnikovs) occupying an adjacent children’s library and barricading themselves inside.

Later this spring, students took two groups of women hostage (including one group of Chinese expatriates) whom they accused of engaging in prostitution. In May, the students abducted four policemen and held them in exchange for some arrested colleagues. In all of these militant activities, the female students from Jamia Hafsa were in the thick of the trouble.

Given the historical trajectory of female suicide bombers and the concept’s acceptance in the jihadist community in Iraq and the Palestinian territories, and considering the conditions that have produced female suicide bombers in the past, it is not hard to forecast that some of the young women who survived the bloody attacks against the Nahr el-Bared refugee camp and the Red Mosque will go on to become suicide bombers. In fact, when one considers all the militant activity the women from Jamia Hafsa have been involved in so far, it is amazing they have not yet been involved in a suicide bombing in Pakistan.

Reprinted with permission from Stratfor.

Stratfor

Iraq Branch of Al Qaeda Forms Female Suicide Bomber Brigade

September 13, 2007

Postings appeared yesterday on several online news services reporting that the “Islamic State of Iraq” an alleged Al Qaeda affiliated group, had formed a female suicide bomber brigade called the “Al-Khansa Suicide Bomber Brigade.” Al-Khansa was a 7th century Arab female poetess with ties to the founder of Islam.

I’ve written about female suicide bombers and the threat they pose to protected persons many times on this site. The concept of a female suicide bomber brigade is not a new one. The Tamil Tigers (LTTE) have used female suicide bombers for years and have been quite successful in targeting key political leaders.

Whether Al Khansa, or groups like it, can operate outside of Iraq is a different consideration but this should serve to remind us that the adversary views females as an effective terrorist partners. One of the biggest advantages female suicide bombers have is male bias. Females are not viewed in the same category as men when it comes to being dentified as a threat. A male’s instinct is to key in on other males as the aggressor. This tendency has given female terrorist operatives significant advantages when it comes to performing such terrorist tasks as conducting surveillance or assuming the role of a suicide bomber. Archaeologists say that you’ll find exactly what you are looking for. If you are looking for a male as the threat, then females will be excluded from that category and hence, their likelihood of detection.

In closing, female suicide bombers have been very effective particularly in Southeast Asia and to a lesser degree in the Middle East. Female suicide bombers will become more common in the future as they seek to assume greater roles within their respective terrorist groups. Executive Protection specialists must continually hone their mindset in regards to recognizing that threats come from all directions.

Homeland Security National Terror Alert » Al-Qaeda Announces All-Female Suicide Bomber Brigade



Technorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Powered by ScribeFire.